Climate Change Inaction and Meaning

Philosophies

Philip J. Wilson¹ 

[1] Independent Researcher, Kent CT18 8EN, UK;

关键词: environmental limits;    Sustainable Development Goals;    green growth;    direct action;   

DOI  :  10.3390/philosophies6040101

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Continuing growth, insofar as it increases human environmental impact, is in conflict with the environment. ‘Green growth’, if it increases the absolute size of the economy, is an oxymoron. Environmental limits are discountenanced, a pretence made possible because they are difficult to specify in advance. The consequent weakness in public discourse, both moral and intellectual, has worsened into contradiction as it has become ever more studiously unadmitted. It is obscured with language that is misleading or self-contradictory, and even issues from institutions that exist (and are relied upon) to respect correctness. At its most conforming it gives rise to overshoot, by which statements meant to sound authoritative are in fact open to ridicule. Such untruthfulness perpetuates climate change inaction, and in a kind of direct action those using such language, contrary to their public or professional duty, could be asked to justify themselves in plain English.

【 授权许可】

Unknown