Mixed-method approaches to strengthen economic evaluations in implementation research

Implementation Science

Daniel Eisenberg¹  Lana O. Beasley²  Jane F. Silovsky³  Peter Mundey³  Alex R. Dopp⁴ 

[1] Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health;Department of Human Development and Family Science, Oklahoma State University;Department of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center;Department of Psychological Science, University of Arkansas;

关键词: Economic evaluation;    Mixed methods;    Health economics;    Cost-effectiveness;    Cost-benefit;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s13012-018-0850-6

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract Background Guidance from economic evaluations on which implementation strategies represent the best return on investment will be critical to advancing the Triple Aim of health care: improving patient care and population health while minimizing per-capita cost. The results of traditional (quantitative) economic evaluations are limited by a remaining “qualitative residual” of contextual information and stakeholders perspectives, which cannot be captured by monetary values alone and is particularly prevalent in implementation science research. The emergence of qualitative methods for economic evaluation offers a promising solution. Main body To maximize the contributions of economic evaluations to implementation science, we recommend that researchers embrace a mixed-methods research agenda that merges traditional quantitative approaches with innovative, contextually grounded qualitative methods. Such studies are exceedingly rare at present. To assist implementation scientists in making use of mixed methods in this research context, we present an adapted taxonomy of mixed-method studies relevant to economic evaluation. We then illustrate the application of mixed methods in a recently completed cost-effectiveness evaluation, making use of an adapted version of reporting standards for economic evaluations. Conclusions By incorporating qualitative methods, implementation researchers can enrich their economic evaluations with detailed, context-specific information that tells the full story of the costs and impacts of implementation. We end by providing suggestions for building a research agenda in mixed-method economic evaluation, along with more resources and training to support investigators who wish to answer our call to action.

【 授权许可】

Unknown