The Effects of Combining the Variables in Allometric Biomass Models on Biomass Estimates over Large Forest Areas: A European Beech Case Study

Forests

Ioan Dutcă¹  Erick O. Osewe¹ 

[1] Department of Silviculture, Transilvania University of Brasov, Sirul Beethoven, 1, 500123 Brasov, Romania;

关键词: forest biomass;    allometric models;    Fagus sylvatica;    bias;    forest carbon;   

DOI  :  10.3390/f12101428

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Effective initiatives for forest-based mitigation of climate change rely on continuous efforts to improve the estimation of forest biomass. Allometric biomass models, which are nonlinear models that predict aboveground biomass (AGB) as a function of diameter at breast height (D) and tree height (H), are typically used in forest biomass estimations. A combined variable D²H may be used instead of two separate predictors. The Q-ratio (i.e., the ratio between the parameter estimates of D and parameter estimates of H, in a separate variable model) was proposed recently as a measure to guide the decision on whether D and H can be safely combined into D²H, being shown that the two model forms are similar when Q = 2.0. Here, using five European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) biomass datasets (of different Q-ratios ranging from 1.50 to 5.05) and an inventory dataset for the same species, we investigated the effects of combining the variables in allometric models on biomass estimation over large forest areas. The results showed that using a combined variable model instead of a separate variable model to predict biomass of European beech trees resulted in overestimation of mean AGB per hectare for Q > 2.0 (i.e., by 6.3% for Q = 5.05), underestimation for Q < 2.0 (i.e., by –3.9% for Q = 1.50), whereas for Q = 2.03, the differences were minimum (0.1%). The standard errors of mean AGB per hectare were similar for Q = 2.03 (differences up to 0.2%), and the differences increased with the Q-ratio, by up to 10.2% for Q = 5.05. Therefore, we demonstrated for European beech that combining the variables in allometric biomass models when Q ≠ 2.0 resulted in biased estimates of mean AGB per hectare and of uncertainty.

【 授权许可】

Unknown