Effectiveness of a social inclusion program in people with non-affective psychosis

BMC Psychiatry

Flavia Baccari¹  Fausto Mazzi¹  Fabrizio Starace¹  Francesco Mungai¹  Lisa Brescancin²  Manuela Ciambellini² 

[1] Department of Mental Health and Drug Abuse, AUSL Modena;Social Point Modena – Centro Servizi Volontariato;

关键词: Social inclusion;    Psychosis;    Recovery;    Self-stigma;    Disability;    Quality of life;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12888-018-1728-5

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract Background People with psychotic illness suffer from reduced quality of life and often from an insufficient level of social inclusion. These variables are associated with several negative outcomes, such as higher neuro-cognitive deficits, negative symptoms, internalised stigma, increased cardiovascular risk and, most importantly, excess mortality. To date, only a minority of social interventions in psychosis have been investigated. Since 2011, the Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse in Modena introduced the “Social Point” program, which provides social inclusion interventions to promote active social participation for patients suffering from severe mental illness. The aim of this study was to assess whether a social inclusion intervention is associated with better outcomes in terms of personal and social recovery, with particular reference to the areas of social functioning and activity, and subjective dimensions such as self-esteem, self-stigma and perceived quality of life. Methods A cross-sectional design was adopted to compare 30 subjects, selected at the completion of “Social Point” program, with a group of subjects, matched for socio-demographic and clinical features, selected from a wait list for “Social Point”. All subjects were evaluated by means of instruments assessing: level of disability, level of functioning, severity of psychopathology, self-esteem, internalised stigma and quality of life. Results Overall, the results of the study suggest that social inclusion interventions may be effective in people suffering from non-affective psychosis. A dose-effect relationship was also found between higher number of activities per patient and better outcomes within both social and psychopathological domains. However, due to the cross-sectional design of the study no definitive causality can be inferred. Conclusion Psychosocial interventions promoting social inclusion are likely to represent an effective approach to improve personal and social recovery.

【 授权许可】

Unknown