The Expressive Dimension of the Union Citizenship Expulsion Regime: Joined Cases C-331/16 and C-366/16, K and HF

European Papers

Stephen Coutts¹ 

[1] University College Cork;

关键词: geneva convention art. 1f;    public policy and public security;    expulsion;    fundamental interests of member states;    arts 2 and 3 teu;    eu citizenship;   

DOI  :  10.15166/2499-8249/241

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2018 3(2), 833-841 | European Forum Insight of 10 October 2018 | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. Facts/Context. - II.1. Case C-331/16, K. - II.2. Case C-366/16, HF. - III. Opinion of AG Saugmandsgaard Øe. - IV. Judgment of the Court of Justice. - V. Comment. | (Abstract) The case of in K and HF (Court of Justice, judgment of 2 May 2018, joined cases C-331/16 and C-366/16) turns on a very specific set of facts, namely the restriction of Union citizen's residence rights on the basis of war crimes and crimes against humanity. Nonetheless, in its judgment the Court of Justice continues its development of the expulsion regime for Union citizens to incorporate an offence based, moralised interpretation of public policy and public security. In doing so, it develops an expressive dimension to the expulsion regime, using it to express the values of the Member States and the Union legal orders.

【 授权许可】

Unknown