期刊论文详细信息
Resuscitation Plus
Cardiac arrest: An interdisciplinary scoping review of the literature from 2019
Scott A. Cohen1  Francis Han2  Torben K. Becker3  David B. Crabb4  Charles W. Hwang4  Ramani Balu4  K. Leslie Avery4  Carolina B. Maciel4  Karl W. Huesgen4  Travis W. Murphy5  Sarah S. Gul6  Muhammad Abdul Baker Chowdhury6  Meenakshi P. Balakrishnan7 
[1] Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA;Department of Neurology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA;Division of Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA;Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA;Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA;Division of Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA;Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA;
关键词: Heart arrest;    Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest;    Cardiopulmonary resuscitation;    Epidemiology;    Emergency medical services;    Sudden cardiac death;   
DOI  :  
来源: DOAJ
【 摘 要 】

Objectives: The Interdisciplinary Cardiac Arrest Research Review (ICARE) group was formed in 2018 to conduct a systematic annual search of peer-reviewed literature relevant to cardiac arrest. Now in its second year, the goals of the review are to illustrate best practices in research and help reduce compartmentalization of knowledge by disseminating clinically relevant advances in the field of cardiac arrest across disciplines. Methods: An electronic search of PubMed using keywords related to cardiac arrest was conducted. Title and abstracts retrieved by these searches were screened for relevance, classified by article type (original research or review), and sorted into 7 categories. Screened manuscripts underwent standardized scoring of overall methodological quality and impact on the categorized fields of study by reviewer teams lead by a subject-matter expert editor. Articles scoring higher than 99 percentiles by category-type were selected for full critique. Systematic differences between editors’ and reviewers’ scores were assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: A total of 3348 articles were identified on initial search; of these, 1364 were scored after screening for relevance and deduplication, and forty-five underwent full critique. Epidemiology & Public Health represented 24% of fully reviewed articles with Prehospital Resuscitation, Technology & Care, and In-Hospital Resuscitation & Post-Arrest Care Categories both representing 20% of fully reviewed articles. There were no significant differences between editor and reviewer scoring. Conclusions: The sheer number of articles screened is a testament to the need for an accessible source calling attention to high-quality and impactful research and serving as a high-yield reference for clinicians and scientists seeking to follow the ever-growing body of cardiac arrest-related literature. This will promote further development of the unique and interdisciplinary field of cardiac arrest medicine.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次