期刊论文详细信息
Health Research Policy and Systems
Methodological pluralism for better evaluations of complex interventions: lessons from evaluating an innovation platform in Australia
F. Cunningham1  R. Bainbridge2  D. Peiris3  S. Abimbola3  R. Bailie4  M. Passey4  K. Conte4  J. Bailie4  A. Laycock4 
[1]Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University
[2]School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University
[3]The School of Public Health, The University of Sydney
[4]The University Centre for Rural Health, The University of Sydney
关键词: Innovation platforms;    Developmental evaluation;    Principles-focused evaluation;    Network analysis;    Collaborations;    Utilization-focused;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12961-022-00814-5
来源: DOAJ
【 摘 要 】
Abstract Complex interventions, such as innovation platforms, pose challenges for evaluators. A variety of methodological approaches are often required to build a more complete and comprehensive understanding of how complex interventions work. In this paper, we outline and critically appraise a methodologically pluralist evaluation of an innovation platform to strengthen primary care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians. In doing so, we aim to identify lessons learned from the approach taken and add to existing literature on implementing evaluations in complex settings, such as innovation platforms. The pluralist design used four evaluation approaches—developmental evaluation, principles-focused evaluation, network analysis, and framework analysis—with differing strengths and challenges. Taken together, the multiple evaluation approaches yielded a detailed description and nuanced understanding of the formation, functioning and outcomes of the innovation platform that would be difficult to achieve with any single evaluation method. While a methodologically pluralist design may place additional pressure on logistical and analytic resources available, it enables a deeper understanding of the mechanisms that underlie complex interventions.
【 授权许可】

Unknown   

  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次