Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía | |
The Telos Alluded in the Ortega’s Philosophy of Art (the Historicism that Nicol Ignores in his Review) | |
Enrique Ferrari Nieto1  | |
[1] Université de Fribourg | |
[2] Universität Freiburg; | |
关键词: autonomía del arte; generación; J. Margolis; razón histórica; vanguardias.; | |
DOI : 10.5209/rev_ASHF.2014.v31.n2.47578 | |
来源: DOAJ |
【 摘 要 】
Eduardo Nicol studies the Ortega’s historical reason: the historicism with which he reorients his vitalism. But in his review he does not include the philosophy of art: how Ortega interprets the avant-garde art as the symptom of a new era, because he understands that the defense of the autonomy of art by young artists responds to their understanding of art as inconsequential (in line with a new sensitivity vital in the early twentieth century). My thesis: With his notion of generation, Ortega starts his analysis of new art from its condition of historical product. Understood a telos for art history that places it closer to the target (pure art) than romantic art (its opposite).
【 授权许可】
Unknown