Arguing for Atonement?

TheoLogica

Richard Brian Davis¹ 

[1] Tyndale University;

关键词: Abstract Objects;    Aseity;    Atonement;    Nominalism;    Platonism;   

DOI  :  10.14428/thl.v6i2.63473

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

According to William Lane Craig, to avoid compromising God’s aseity we must embrace nominalism with respect to mathematical and logical objects. There are no numbers, propositions, possible worlds, properties, or relations. In this paper I argue that Craig’s nominalism threatens to undermine his theological stance on the atonement.

【 授权许可】

Unknown