期刊论文详细信息
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
Comparison of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil for attenuation of hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation
Hyojoong Kim1  Young-Jae Kim1  Se Hun Lim1  Kun Moo Lee1  Chee-Mahn Shin1  Kwangrae Cho1  Jeong Han Lee1  Myoung-Hun Kim1  Hyun-Tae Kim1 
[1] Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Busan, Korea.;
关键词: dexmedetomidine;    endotracheal intubation;    hemodynamics;    remifentanil;   
DOI  :  10.4097/kjae.2012.63.2.124
来源: DOAJ
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThis study was designed to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil used in anesthetic induction on hemodynamic change after direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation.MethodsA total of 90 ASA class 1 or 2 patients were randomly assigned to one of 3 groups to receive one of the following treatments in a double-blind manner: normal saline (Group C, n = 30), dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg (Group D, n = 30), remifentanil 1 µg/kg (Group R, n= 30). Anesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg/kg and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg and maintained with 2 vol% sevoflurane and 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen. In group D, dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg was infused for 10 min before tracheal intubation. Patients in group R was received 1 µg/kg of remifentanil 1 minute before tracheal intubation. The systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate were recorded from entrance to operation room to 5 min after tracheal intubation.ResultsThe percent increase in systolic and diastolic blood pressure due to tracheal intubation in group D and R were significantly lower than that of group C (P < 0.05). The heart rate 1 min after tracheal intubation was lower in groups R and D than in the group C (P < 0.05).ConclusionsIn healthy normotensive patients, the use of dexmedetomidine during anesthetic induction suppressed a decrease in blood pressure due to anesthetic induction and blunted the hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次