期刊论文详细信息
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
The use of multiple sources of social information in contest behaviour: testing the social cognitive abilities of a cichlid fish
Lyndon Alexander Jordan1  Satoshi eAwata2  Tomohiro eTakeyama3  Takashi eHotta4  Masanori eKohda4  Dik eHeg5 
[1] Max Planck Institute for Ornithology;Niigata University;Okayama University of Science;Osaka City University;University of Bern;
关键词: transitive inference;    individual recognition;    eavesdropping;    Winner and loser effect;    Julidochromis transcriptus;    social cognitive ability;   
DOI  :  10.3389/fevo.2015.00085
来源: DOAJ
【 摘 要 】

Theory suggests that living in large social groups with dynamic social interactions often favours the evolution of enhanced cognitive abilities. Studies of how animals assess their own contest ability commonly focus on a single cognitive task, and little is known about the diversity or co-occurrence of cognitive abilities in social species. We examined how a highly social cichlid fish Julidochromis transcriptus uses four major cognitive abilities in contest situations; direct experience, winner/loser effects, social eavesdropping and transitive inference (TI). We conducted experiments in which fish assessed the social status of rivals after either direct physical contests or observed contests. Individuals used direct information from a previous physical encounter to re-establish dominance without additional contact, but winner/loser effects were not observed. Social eavesdropping alone was ruled out, but we found that transitive reasoning was used to infer social dominance of other individuals of unknown status. Our results suggest that in stable hierarchical social groups, estimations of contest ability, based on individual recognition pathways such as TI and direct experience, are more prevalent than social eavesdropping or winner/loser effects. We suggest that advanced cognitive abilities might be widespread among highly social fishes, but have previously gone undetected.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次