Relevance of two manual tumour volume estimation methods for diffuse low-grade gliomas

Healthcare Technology Letters

Luc Taillandier¹  Yann. Gaudeau¹  Jean-Marie Moureaux¹  Meriem Ben Abdallah¹  Marie Blonski¹  Sophie Wantz-Mézières² 

[1]Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy (CRAN)

[2]Institut Elie Cartan de Lorraine and INRIA BIGS

关键词: tumours;    cancer;    brain;    biomedical MRI;    medical image processing;    image reconstruction;    image segmentation;    statistical analysis;    manual tumour volume estimation methods;    diffuse low-grade gliomas;    MRI dataset estimation;    three-diameters solution;    software-based volume reconstruction;    manual segmentations approach;    inter-practitioners variability;    software-based manual segmentations;    DLGGs MRI datasets;    delineated DLGGs' MRI scans;    statistical analysis;    segmented tumour volumes;    pixels;    resected DLGGs;   

DOI  :  10.1049/htl.2017.0013

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Management of diffuse low-grade glioma (DLGG) relies extensively on tumour volume estimation from MRI datasets. Two methods are currently clinically used to define this volume: the commonly used three-diameters solution and the more rarely used software-based volume reconstruction from the manual segmentations approach. The authors conducted an initial study of inter-practitioners’ variability of software-based manual segmentations on DLGGs MRI datasets. A panel of 13 experts from various specialties and years of experience delineated 12 DLGGs’ MRI scans. A statistical analysis on the segmented tumour volumes and pixels indicated that the individual practitioner, the years of experience and the specialty seem to have no significant impact on the segmentation of DLGGs. This is an interesting result as it had not yet been demonstrated and as it encourages cross-disciplinary collaboration. Their second study was with the three-diameters method, investigating its impact and that of the software-based volume reconstruction from manual segmentations method on tumour volume. They relied on the same dataset and on a participant from the first study. They compared the average of tumour volumes acquired by software reconstruction from manual segmentations method with tumour volumes obtained with the three-diameters method. The authors found that there is no statistically significant difference between the volumes estimated with the two approaches. These results correspond to non-operated and easily delineable DLGGs and are particularly interesting for time-consuming CUBE MRIs. Nonetheless, the three-diameters method has limitations in estimating tumour volumes for resected DLGGs, for which case the software-based manual segmentation method becomes more appropriate.

【 授权许可】

Unknown