Economic Outcomes Related to Persistence and Dosing of Celecoxib in Patients with Osteoarthritis (OA) Using a Retrospective Claims Database Analysis

ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research

关键词: generic;    healthcare resource use;    celebrex;    nsaids;    switching;    discontinuation;   

DOI  :  

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Courtney Johnson,1 Jennifer Stephens,1 Christopher Walker,2 Joseph C Cappelleri,3 Ahmed Shelbaya41Pharmerit International, Real World Evidence and Data Analytics, Bethesda, MD, USA;2Pfizer Ltd., Global Medical Affairs, Tadworth, Surrey, England;3Pfizer Inc., Statistics, Groton, CT, USA;4Pfizer Inc., Health Economics and Outcomes Research, New York, NY, USACorrespondence: Jennifer StephensPharmerit International, 4350 East West Highway, Suite 1100, Bethesda, MD, USATel [phone]Email [e-mail]: This study describes treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and costs associated with persistence, switching, and dosing of branded celecoxib in osteoarthritis (OA) patients.Methods: This retrospective claims database analysis used MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters (MarketScan) data from 2009 to 2013. Included patients were adult (≥ 18 years), incident celecoxib users with ≥ 1 OA claim. The treatment switch analysis analyzed outcomes in patients persistent on celecoxib versus switched to a generic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). The dosing analysis stratified patients as under-dose (< 200 mg per day) and standard dose (≥ 200 mg per day). HCRU, costs, and treatment duration were compared in persistent versus switched and standard dose versus under-dose patients using descriptive, multivariate logistic regression, and Kaplan–Meier analysis.Results: A total of 65,530 patients met the inclusion criteria. During follow-up, 83% discontinued celecoxib without switching, 10% were persistent, and 5% switched to a generic NSAID. Ninety percent received a standard dose of celecoxib. Switched (versus persistent) patients had significantly higher all-cause hospital admissions, length of stay, emergency room (ER) visits, and office visits per person year (PPY), all P < 0.001; and under-dosed (versus standard dose) patients had significantly higher hospital admissions (P< 0.001), length of stay (P< 0.001), and ER visits (P= 0.021) PPY. Persistent versus switched patients had lower mean total all-cause costs PPY ($20,378 vs $23,949, P< 0.001). Standard dose versus under-dose patients had lower mean total all-cause costs ($23,680 vs $26,955 PPY, P< 0.001), and not statistically significant higher mean total OA-related costs ($5698 vs $5524 PPY, P=0.441).Conclusion: Patients that switched from branded celecoxib to a generic NSAID or received an under-dose of branded celecoxib had higher average overall HCRU and costs. OA-related inpatient and outpatient cost savings may offset the higher drug cost of celecoxib for persistent patients.Keywords: generic, healthcare resource use, Celebrex, NSAIDS, switching, discontinuation

【 授权许可】

Unknown