Normative aspects of the science evaluation: thoughts for the research in History of the Sciences and Health of the House of Oswaldo Cruz

RECIIS

Marcus Vinícius Pereira da Silva¹  Jacqueline Ribeiro Cabral²  Lídia Silva de Freitas² 

[1] Universidade Federal Fluminense. Niterói, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Casa de Oswaldo Cruz. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.;Universidade Federal Fluminense. Niterói, Brasil.;

关键词: Gestão de Ciência;    Tecnologia e Inovação em Saúde;    Recursos para a Pesquisa;    Avaliação da Ciência;    História das Ciências e da Saúde.;   

DOI  :  10.29397/reciis.v11i0.1403

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

This paper aims to analyze the normative aspects related to the science evaluation, which is situated the research in History of the Sciences and Health of the House of Oswaldo Cruz (COC) / Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz). Brings reflections on the main models of science evaluation, the peer review and quantitative indicators, and indicates the incorporation of new models, open science and altmetric indicators. Turns out that all models are criticized and there is no consensus on a standard. Describes the evaluation criteria adopted by Fiocruz, COC and the area of History of Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes). Highlights the creation of the Fiocruz`s Observatory on Science, Technology and Innovation and the Open Access Policy as efforts to overcome the limits of traditional models of science evaluation and the area of History of Capes changed the evaluation criteria for periodicals, beginning to use the insertion in databases and bibliometric indicators in the classification.

【 授权许可】

Unknown