期刊论文详细信息
Toxins
An International Proficiency Test to Detect, Identify and Quantify Ricin in Complex Matrices
Brigitte G. Dorner1  Sylvia Worbs1  Martin Skiba1  Jennifer Bender1  Werner Luginbühl2  Heinz Schimmel3  Reinhard Zeleny3 
[1] Biological Toxins, Centre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Robert Koch Institute, Seestrasse 10, 13353 Berlin, Germany;ChemStat, Aarstrasse 98, 3005 Bern, Switzerland;Joint Research Centre, Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements, European Commission, Retieseweg 111, 2440 Geel, Belgium;
关键词: proficiency test;    ricin;    reference material;    standardized detection;   
DOI  :  10.3390/toxins7124859
来源: DOAJ
【 摘 要 】

While natural intoxications with seeds of Ricinus communis (R. communis) have long been known, the toxic protein ricin contained in the seeds is of major concern since it attracts attention of those intending criminal, terroristic and military misuse. In order to harmonize detection capabilities in expert laboratories, an international proficiency test was organized that aimed at identifying good analytical practices (qualitative measurements) and determining a consensus concentration on a highly pure ricin reference material (quantitative measurements). Sample materials included highly pure ricin as well as the related R. communis agglutinin (RCA120) spiked into buffer, milk and meat extract; additionally, an organic fertilizer naturally contaminated with R. communis shred was investigated in the proficiency test. The qualitative results showed that either a suitable combination of immunological, mass spectrometry (MS)-based and functional approaches or sophisticated MS-based approaches alone successfully allowed the detection and identification of ricin in all samples. In terms of quantification, it was possible to determine a consensus concentration of the highly pure ricin reference material. The results provide a basis for further steps in quality assurance and improve biopreparedness in expert laboratories worldwide.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:6次