The Difference in Open Innovation between Open Access and Closed Access, According to the Change of Collective Intelligence and Knowledge Amount

Sustainability

Zheng Liu¹  Jinhyo Joseph Yun²  Euiseob Jeong³  Sangwoo Kim³  Kyunghun Kim⁴ 

[1]Cardiff School of Management, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff CF5 2YB, UK

[2]Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology, and Open Innovation Academy, Seoul National University, Seoul 42988, Korea

[3]Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, Seoul 02456, Korea

[4]Local Development Research Institute (LADI), Daegu 42768, Korea

关键词: open access journal;    closed access journal;    collective intelligence;    open innovation;    reference;    citation;   

DOI  :  10.3390/su14052574

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

This study explored the differences in the effects of collective intelligence and references on open innovation between open and closed access journals. This study analyzed the moderating effect of references on the motivation of collective intelligence on open innovation from 2003 to 2006 and 2013 to 2016, considered to be the digital transformation era. The Scopus database on open and closed access journals was used for ordinary regression analysis. During the 2003–2006 period, only papers in closed access journals demonstrated sufficient effect of collective intelligence and reference on open innovation and the effective moderating role of reference. However, between 2013 and 2016, papers in open and closed access journals demonstrated the incentive effects of collective intelligence and references on citation and the moderating role of references on the correlation between collective intelligence and citation. The increase in digital transformation strengthens the collective intelligence and references of open access journals, and citations of open access journals nearly surpass those of closed access journals.

【 授权许可】

Unknown