Balint groups and narrative medicine compared to a control condition in promoting students’ empathy

BMC Medical Education

Claire Le Jeunne¹  Frédéric Limosin¹  Cédric Lemogne¹  Nicolas Hoertel¹  Christian Ghasarossian²  Céline Buffel du Vaure²  Annie Catu-Pinault²  Philippe Jaury² 

[1] Université de Paris, Faculté de Santé, UFR de Médecine, 15 rue de l’Ecole-de-Médecine;Université de Paris, Faculté de Santé, UFR de Médecine, Département de Médecine Générale;

关键词: Balint groups;    Empathy;    Medical education;    Narrative medicine;    Physician-patient relations;    Students, medical;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12909-020-02316-w

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract Background The perceived importance of clinical empathy may decline among students during medical training. Several interventions have been shown to be effective in promoting or preserving medical students’ empathic abilities, such as empathy skills training or Balint groups. Although narrative medicine training shares some features with these interventions, no randomized study to date examined the efficacy of narrative medicine training. This study aimed to assess the effects of Balint groups and narrative medicine training on clinical empathy measured by the self-rated Jefferson’s School Empathy Scale - Medical Student (JSPE-MS©) among fourth-year medical students. Methods Students who gave their consent to participate were randomly allocated in equal proportion to Balint groups, narrative medicine training or to the control group. Participants in the intervention groups received either seven sessions of 1.5-h Balint groups or a 2-h lecture and five sessions of 1.5-h narrative medicine training from October 2015 to December 2015. The main outcome was the change in JSPE-MS© score from baseline to one week after the last session. Results Data from 362 out of 392 participants were analyzed: 117 in the control group, 125 in the Balint group and 120 in the narrative medicine group. The change in JSPE-MS© score from baseline to follow-up was significantly higher in the Balint group than in the control group [mean (SD): 0.27 (8.00) vs. -2,36 (11.41), t = 2.086, P = 0.038]. The change in JSPE-MS© score in the narrative medicine group [mean (SD): − 0.57 (8.76)] did not significantly differ from the changes in the control group (t = 1.355, P = 0.18) or the Balint group (t = 0.784, P = 0.43). Adjusting for participants’ characteristics at baseline, Balint groups remained associated with better outcomes compared to the control group (β = 2.673, P = 0.030). Conclusions Balint groups may promote clinical empathy to some extent among medical students, at least in the short run.

【 授权许可】

Unknown