“We come as friends”: approaches to social accountability by health committees in Northern Malawi

BMC Health Services Research

Joyce M. Molenaar¹  Christine Ingemann¹  Jacqueline E. W. Broerse¹  Elsbet Lodenstein²  Marjolein Dieleman³  Kondwani Botha⁴  Jenipher Jere Mkandawire⁴  Loan Liem⁵ 

[1] Athena Institute for Research on Innovation and Communication in Health and Life Sciences Communication (VU University);Athena Institute for Research on Innovation and Communication in Health and Life Sciences, VU University and KIT Gender;Athena Institute for Research on Innovation and Communication in Health and Life Sciences, VU University and KIT Health;Foundation for Children’s Rights;Simavi;

关键词: Social accountability;    Governance;    Health committees;    Health worker performance;    Quality of care;    Maternal health;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12913-019-4069-2

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract Background In Malawi, as in many low-and middle-income countries, health facility committees (HFCs) are involved in the governance of health services. Little is known about the approaches they use and the challenges they face. This study explores how HFCs monitor the quality of health services and how they demand accountability of health workers for their performance. Methods Documentary analysis and key informant interviews (7) were complemented by interviews with purposefully selected HFC members (22) and health workers (40) regarding their experiences with HFCs. Data analysis was guided by a coding scheme informed by social accountability concepts complemented by inductive analysis to identify participants’ perceptions and meanings of processes of social accountability facilitated by HFCs. Results The results suggest that HFCs address poor health worker performance (such as absenteeism, poor treatments and informal payments), and report severe misconduct to health authorities. The informal and constructive approach that most HFCs use is shaped by formal definitions and common expectations of the role of HFCs in service delivery as well as resource constraints. The primary function of social accountability through HFCs appears to be co-production: the management of social relations around the health facility and the promotion of a minimum level of access and quality of services. Conclusions Policymakers and HFC support programs should take into account the broad task description of HFCs and integrate social accountability approaches in existing quality of care programs. The study also underscores the need to clarify accountability arrangements and linkages with upward accountability approaches in the system.

【 授权许可】

Unknown