Combining Evapotranspiration and Soil Apparent Electrical Conductivity Mapping to Identify Potential Precision Irrigation Benefits

Remote Sensing

卷:11

Eric G. Booth¹  Steven P. Loheide²  Cadan R. Cummings³  Samuel C. Zipper⁴  Mallika A. Nocco⁵  Christopher J. Kucharik⁵ 

[1] Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI 53706, USA;

[2] Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1415 Engineering Dr., Madison, WI 53706, USA;

[3] Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA;

[4] Kansas Geological Survey, University of Kansas, 1930 Constant Ave, Lawrence, KS 66047, USA;

[5] Nelson Institute Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1710 University Ave., Madison, WI 53726, USA;

关键词: precision agriculture;    precision irrigation;    evapotranspiration;    apparent electrical conductivity;    proximal sensing;    soil water content;    crop rotations;    coarse-textured soils;    aerial remote sensing;   

DOI  :  10.3390/rs11212460

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Precision irrigation optimizes the spatiotemporal application of water using evapotranspiration (ET) maps to assess water stress or soil apparent electrical conductivity (EC_a) maps as a proxy for plant available water content. However, ET and EC_a maps are rarely used together. We developed high-resolution ET and EC_a maps for six irrigated fields in the Midwest United States between 2014−2016. Our research goals were to (1) validate ET maps developed using the High-Resolution Mapping of EvapoTranspiration (HRMET) model and aerial imagery via comparison with ground observations in potato, sweet corn, and pea agroecosystems; (2) characterize relationships between ET and EC_a; and (3) identify potential precision irrigation benefits across rotations. We demonstrated the synergy of combined ET and EC_a mapping for evaluating whether intrafield differences in EC_a correspond to actual water use for different crop rotations. We found that ET and EC_a have stronger relationships in sweet corn and potato rotations than field corn. Thus, sweet corn and potato crops may benefit more from precision irrigation than field corn, even when grown rotationally on the same field. We recommend that future research consider crop rotation, intrafield soil variability, and existing irrigation practices together when determining potential water use, savings, and yield gains from precision irrigation.

【 授权许可】

Unknown