O problema das leis em Hobbes

DoisPontos

卷:6

关键词: Natural law and civil law;    Hobbes;    Political philosophy;   

DOI  :  

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

After the question “how could Hobbes write the natural law, if it is no written law?” I’ll try to approach the relationship between natural and civil law after the instauration of the commonwealth. In this sense, I’ll pay attention to the Hobbesian distinction among “written law” and “written register” of law and a few consequences after this distinction. For example, if, how Hobbes says, the correct interpretation of natural law doesn’t depend on philosophers, but only on the authority of commonwealth, would include itself the legitimation of the formulation of the natural laws? The paradox of the first question seems to be important, however, negligenced from Hobbesian critical literature. Its intent is to investigate this negligence into better understanding his philosophical postulate,that includes important points like the “silence of law”, the right of self-defense, foro interno and foro externo, State and government.

【 授权许可】

Unknown