期刊论文详细信息
Comprehensive Psychiatry 卷:109
Group and sex differences in social cognition in bipolar disorder, schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder and healthy people
Maria Serra-Blasco1  Jesús Cobo2  Ximena Goldberg2  Narcís Cardoner3  Eduard Vieta4  Muriel Vicent-Gil5  Guillermo Lahera6  Abigail Jubert7  Carmen Massons7  Diego Palao7  Josep Maria Crosas7  Sol Fernández-Gonzalo7  Mercè Jodar7  Guillem Navarra-Ventura7 
[1] Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain;
[2] Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain;
[3] Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, International Excellence Campus, Bellaterra, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalonia, Spain;
[4] Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí I3PT, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Catalonia, Spain;
[5] Department of Psychiatry and Forensic Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, International Excellence Campus, Bellaterra, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalonia, Spain;
[6] Department of Mental Health, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí I3PT, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Catalonia, Spain;
关键词: Sex differences;    Emotion recognition;    Theory of mind;    Bipolar disorder;    Schizophrenia;    Healthy people;   
DOI  :  
来源: DOAJ
【 摘 要 】

Background: Impairment of social cognition is documented in bipolar disorder (BD) and schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder (SCH). In healthy individuals, women perform better than men in some of its sub-domains. However, in BD and SCH the results are mixed. Our aim was to compare emotion recognition, affective Theory of Mind (ToM) and first- and second-order cognitive ToM in BD, SCH and healthy subjects, and to investigate sex-related differences. Methods: 120 patients (BD = 60, SCH = 60) and 40 healthy subjects were recruited. Emotion recognition was assessed by the Pictures of Facial Affect (POFA) test, affective ToM by the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) and cognitive ToM by several false-belief stories. Group and sex differences were analyzed using parametric (POFA, RMET) and non-parametric (false-belief stories) tests. The impact of age, intelligence quotient (IQ) and clinical variables on patient performance was examined using a series of linear/logistic regressions. Results: Both groups of patients performed worse than healthy subjects on POFA, RMET and second-order false-belief (p < 0.001), but no differences were found between them. Instead, their deficits were related to older age and/or lower IQ (p < 0.01). Subthreshold depression was associated with a 6-fold increased risk of first-order false-belief failure (p < 0.001). Sex differences were only found in healthy subjects, with women outperforming men on POFA and RMET (p ≤ 0.012), but not on first/second-order false-belief. Limitations: The cross-sectional design does not allow for causal inferences. Conclusion: BD and SCH patients had deficits in emotion recognition, affective ToM, and second-order cognitive ToM, but their performance was comparable to each other, highlighting that the differences between them may be subtler than previously thought. First-order cognitive ToM remained intact, but subthreshold depression altered their normal functioning. Our results suggest that the advantage of healthy women in the emotional and affective aspects of social cognition would not be maintained in BD and SCH.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:1次