期刊论文详细信息
Frontiers in Pharmacology 卷:13
Tools for Identifying Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions for Children and Their Applicability in Clinical Practices: A Systematic Review
Guo Cheng1  Lingli Zhang4  Liang Huang4  Sha Diao4  Zhe Chen4  Hailong Li4  Linan Zeng4  Qin Yu6  Siyu Li7  Zhi-Jun Jia8 
[1] Department of Pediatrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China;
[2] Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China;
[3] Evidence-based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China;
[4] Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China;
[5] Laboratory of Molecular Translational Medicine, Center for Translational Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China;
[6] National Drug Clinical Trial Institute, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China;
[7] West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China;
[8] West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China;
关键词: children;    adolescents;    inappropriate prescriptions;    potentially inappropriate medication;    potential prescribing omission;    rational drug use;   
DOI  :  10.3389/fphar.2022.787113
来源: DOAJ
【 摘 要 】

Background: Drug use safety in children is a global public health problem. The potentially inappropriate prescription screening tools are expected to reduce adverse drug reactions and promote rational drug use.Objectives: To systematically evaluate children’s potentially inappropriate prescription screening tools and validation studies on these tools.Methods: We systematically searched six databases PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP and Wanfang Data. Two reviewers independently selected articles by the eligible criteria and extracted data. Then we evaluated the coverage of diseases or drugs in these tools and the consistency of items between tools.Results: Five children’s potentially inappropriate prescription screening tools were identified, most tools were formed by Delphi expert consensus and focused on respiratory system drugs, anti-infective drugs, and gastrointestinal drugs. The coincidence rates of items between the POPI and the POPI Int, the POPI and the POPI United Kingdom, the POPI United Kingdom and the POPI int, and the POPI United Kingdom and the PIPc were 82.0, 55.1, 51.0 and 2.2% respectively, and the KIDs List did not overlap other four tools. Only the POPI tool developed by French experts was comprehensively validated by studies and most tools have not been validated.Conclusion: The development of screening tools for potentially inappropriate prescribing in children is a neglected field and most tools lack studies to validate clinical applicability. More researchers need to form their national potentially inappropriate prescription screening tools for children based on the best available clinical evidence and the actual clinical situation in their countries.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次