Evaluation of geoimputation strategies in a large case study

International Journal of Health Geographics

卷:17

Naci Dilekli¹  Kirsten M. de Beurs²  Amanda E. Janitz³  Janis E. Campbell³ 

[1] Center for Spatial Analysis, University of Oklahoma;

[2] Department of Geography and Environmental Sustainability, University of Oklahoma;

[3] The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center;

关键词: Geo-imputation;    Address data;    Coarse resolution;    Census data;    Demographics;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12942-018-0151-y

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract Background Health data usually has missing or incomplete location information, which impacts the quality of research. Geoimputation methods are used by health professionals to increase the spatial resolution of address information for more accurate analyses. The objective of this study was to evaluate geo-imputation methods with respect to the demographic and spatial characteristics of the data. Methods We evaluated four geoimputation methods for increasing spatial resolution of records with known locational information at a coarse level. In order to test and rigorously evaluate two stochastic and two deterministic strategies, we used the Texas Sex Offender registry database with over 50,000 records with known demographic and coordinate information. We reduced the spatial resolution of each record to a census block group and attempted to recover coordinate information using the four strategies. We rigorously evaluated the results in terms of the error distance between the original coordinates and recovered coordinates by studying the results by demographic sub groups and the characteristics of the underlying geography. Results We observed that in estimating the actual location of a case, the weighted mean method is the most superior for each demographic group followed by the maximum imputation centroid, the random point in matching sub-geographies and the random point in all sub-geographies methods. Higher accuracies were observed for minority populations because minorities tend to cluster in certain neighborhoods, which makes it easier to impute their location. Results are greatly affected by the population density of the underlying geographies. We observed high accuracies in high population density areas, which often exist within smaller census blocks, which makes the search space smaller. Similarly, mapping geoimputation accuracies in a spatially explicit manner reveals that metropolitan areas yield higher accuracy results. Conclusions Based on gains in standard error, reduction in mean error and validation results, we conclude that characteristics of the estimated records such as the demographic profile and population density information provide a measure of certainty of geographic imputation.

【 授权许可】

Unknown