Evaluation of Published Articles in the Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran between 2000 and 2009

مجله اپیدمیولوژی ایران

卷:7

H Sharifi¹  OA Nekouei Jahromi¹  H Akbarein¹  A Bahonar¹ 

[1] ;

关键词: Methodology;    Evaluation;    Experimental Study;    Journal;    Veterinary Medicine;    Tehran;   

DOI  :  

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Background and Objectives: Designing and application of experimental studies in veterinary medicine havebeen given paid more attention in recent years. This review aimed to evaluate the methodological quality of allpublished articles in Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran between 2000 and 2009.Methods: Evaluation studies with experimental designs were identified by reviewing titles and abstracts. Tworeviewers coded reporting quality of articles.Results: Of the 738 total published articles, 289 (39.16%) articles had experimental designs. Sample size wasreported in 93.4% of studies, only 36% of studies explained their study design clearly and randomization wasreported only in 33.6%. The ethical approval was mentioned in only two percent. Seventy six percent studies hadcomparison group.Conclusion: The quality of reporting of experimental studies in the Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicinewas not generally acceptable. Therefore it is felt that authors should consider more necessary criteria forstandard publication in veterinary journals.

【 授权许可】

Unknown