Comparison of Mesh and Barbed Suture for Laparoscopic Nephrosplenic Space Ablation in Horses

Animals

卷:11

Anna Cerullo¹  Gessica Giusto¹  Marco Gandini¹  Rodolfo Gialletti²  Sara Nannarone²  Alice Bertoletti²  Nicola Scilimati² 

[1] Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, 06126 Perugia, Italy;

[2] Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy;

关键词: colic;    nephrosplenic entrapment;    nephrosplenic space ablation;    laparoscopy;    barbed suture;    prosthetic mesh;   

DOI  :  10.3390/ani11041096

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Nephrosplenic space (NSS) ablation has been demonstrated to be an effective technique for prevention of left dorsal displacement of the large colon and multiple laparoscopic techniques, among which ablation with mesh or with a barbed suture, have been proposed. Our objective was to compare two laparoscopic techniques for closure of the NSS in twenty-eight horses diagnosed with nephrosplenic entrapment. Medical records of horses that had laparoscopic NSS ablation in two referral centers between 2017–2019 were retrieved. Duration of surgery, complications, and short- and long-term follow-up information were collected and compared. Costs were also calculated and compared. All horses met the inclusion criteria: 9 had NSS ablation with a mesh implant (group M), 19 with barbed suture material (group B). One horse in group B had recurrent colic after discharge. At control laparoscopy after 5 months, the NSS resulted in still not being ablated because of a failure of the suture. In group M, three horses had recurrent colic. One was successfully treated medically, one died of unknown causes and the third required a second laparoscopic suturing at 3–6 months because of failure of the mesh implant. The mean time of surgery and costs were lower in group B compared to group M. The barbed suture technique was faster, more cost-effective and had a lower complication rate than the mesh implant.

【 授权许可】

Unknown