Hurdles and pitfalls in measuring antioxidant efficacy: A critical evaluation of ABTS, DPPH, and ORAC assays

Journal of Functional Foods

卷:14

J. Xie¹  X. Tian²  K.M. Schaich³ 

[1] Department of Food Science, Rutgers University, 65 Dudley Rd., New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8520, USA;

[2] fax: [phone].;

[3] Corresponding author. Department of Food Science, Rutgers University, 65 Dudley Rd., New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8520, USA. Tel.: [phone];

关键词: Antioxidant efficacy assays;    Limitations;    TEAC – Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity assay;    ABTS•+ – 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) assay;    ORAC – Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity assay;    Radical quenching kinetics;   

DOI  :  

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Assays developed to measure radical scavenging ability of natural compounds have been used as a basis for ranking and recommending best foods for consumption. However, assays often were adapted for screening assays with inadequate consideration of reaction chemistry, particularly kinetics. Recent research results raise serious questions about the chemistry, execution, and application of these assays. This paper critically evaluates conceptual and technical issues that limit use and compromise validity of three commonly-used assays – TEAC/ABTS•+, DPPH, and ORAC. Recommendations are made for discontinuing use of ABTS•+ and DPPH radicals for measuring radical quenching, redirecting them instead to distinguishing electron transfer reaction mechanisms. Conditions required for accurate results in ORAC are reviewed, and recommendations are made for redirecting this assay to distinguishing compounds that quench radicals by hydrogen atom transfer. The mechanistic information so gained can be then applied to understanding how natural antioxidants can be used most effectively in foods.

【 授权许可】

Unknown