The success of behavioral economics in improving patient retention within an intensive primary care practice

BMC Family Practice

Erica Levine¹  Maria Duenas²  Sire Sow²  Bernard Ortega²  Nia Medder²  Ania Wajnberg²  Alexandra Capellini³  Phillip Groden³  Sandeep Kishore⁴ 

[1] Arnhold Institute for Global Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Box 1199, 1216 5th Avenue, 10029, New York, NY, USA;Department of General Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Box 1087, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, 10029, New York, NY, USA;Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Box 1199, 1 Gustave L. Levey Place, 10029, New York, NY, USA;School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 533 Parnassus Ave, 94143, San Francisco, CA, USA;

关键词: High-cost populations;    Chronic care;    Patient retention;    Behavioral economics;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12875-021-01593-8

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundA minority of the U.S. population comprises a majority of health care expenses. Health system interventions for high-cost populations aim to improve patient outcomes while reducing costly over-utilization. Missed and inconsistent appointments are associated with poor patient outcomes and increased health care utilization. PEAK Health— Mount Sinai’s intensive primary care clinic for high-cost patients— employed a novel behavioral economics-based intervention to reduce the rate of missed appointments at the practice. Behavioral economics has accomplished numerous successes across the health care field; the effect of a clinic-based behavioral economics intervention on reducing missed appointments has yet to be assessed.MethodsThis was a single-arm, pre-post trial conducted over 1 year involving all active patients at PEAK Health. The intervention consisted of: a) clinic signage, and b) appointment reminder cards containing behavioral economics messaging designed to increase the likelihood patients would complete their subsequent visit; appointment cards (t1) were transitioned to an identical EMR template (t2) at 6 months to boost provider utilization. The primary objective, the success of scheduled appointments, was assessed with visit adherence: the proportion of successful over all scheduled appointments, excluding those cancelled or rescheduled. The secondary objective, the consistency of appointments, was assessed with a 2-month visit constancy rate: the percentage of patients with at least one successful visit every 2 months for 1 year. Both metrics were assessed via a χ2 analysis and together define patient retention.ResultsThe visit adherence rate increased from 74.7% at baseline to 76.5% (p = .22) during t1 and 78.0% (p = .03) during t2. The 2-month visit constancy rate increased from 59.5% at baseline to 74.3% (p = .01) post-intervention.ConclusionsA low-resource, clinic-based behavioral economics intervention was capable of improving patient retention within a traditionally high-cost population. A renewed focus on patient retention— employing the metrics described here— could bolster chronic care efforts and significantly improve the outcomes of high-cost programs by reducing the deleterious effects of missed and inconsistent appointments.

【 授权许可】

CC BY