Improved accuracy of digital implant impressions with newly designed scan bodies: an in vivo evaluation in beagle dogs

BMC Oral Health

Zhuofan Chen¹  Zhipeng Li¹  Ruoxuan Huang¹  Baoxin Huang¹  Yuanxiang Liu¹  Fengxing Zhou² 

[1] Hospital of Stomatology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, No. 56, Lingyuan west road, 510060, Guangzhou, China;KTJ Dental Group, Shenzhen, China;

关键词: Dental implant;    Digital impression;    Scan body;    Edentulous;    Accuracy;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12903-021-01986-2

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThe accuracy of digital impressions for fully edentulous cases is currently insufficient for routinely clinical application. To overcome the challenge, a modified scan body was introduced, which demonstrated satisfactory accuracy in vitro. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of digital impressions using the modified scan bodies with extensional structure versus scan bodies without extensional structure in mandible with two implants in beagle dogs.MethodsThe unilateral mandibular second premolar to second molar were extracted in four beagle dogs. Twelve weeks later, two implants were placed. Five repeated digital impressions were performed with an intraoral scanner on each dog using each of the two different scan bodies: Group I—scan body without extensional structure (SB); Group II—scan body with extensional structure (SBE). The scans were exported to Standard Tessellation Language (STL) files to serve as test data. The dogs were sacrificed and the dissected mandibles were digitalized with a lab scanner to provide reference data. Linear and angular deviations were calculated in an inspection software for accuracy assessment. Statistical analysis was performed with two-way ANOVA. The level of significance was set at α = 0.05.ResultsFor trueness assessment, the mean of absolute linear/angular deviations were 119.53 μm/0.75 degrees in Group I and 68.89 μm/0.36 degrees in Group II. SBE was more accurate than SB regarding both linear (p = 0.008) and angular (p = 0.049) deviations. For precision assessment, the mean of absolute linear/angular deviations were 63.01 μm/0.47 degrees in Group I and 38.38 μm/0.24 degrees in Group II. No significant difference was found.ConclusionsThe application of SBE significantly improved the trueness of digital impressions in mandible with two implants compared to SB. No significant difference was found in terms of precision.

【 授权许可】

CC BY