A critique of the English national policy from a social determinants of health perspective using a realist and problem representation approach: the ‘Childhood Obesity: a plan for action’ (2016, 2018, 2019)

BMC Public Health

Jonathan Wistow¹  Naomi Griffin²  Sophie M. Phillips²  Carolyn Summerbell²  Frances Hillier-Brown³  Hannah Fairbrother⁴  Eleanor Holding⁵  Katie Powell⁵ 

[1]Fuse, the NIHR (UK) Centre for Translational Research in Public Health (website), Newcastle, UK

[2]Department of Sociology, Durham University, Durham, UK

[3]Fuse, the NIHR (UK) Centre for Translational Research in Public Health (website), Newcastle, UK

[4]Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Durham University, Durham, UK

[5]Fuse, the NIHR (UK) Centre for Translational Research in Public Health (website), Newcastle, UK

[6]Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK

[7]Health Sciences School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

[8]ScHARR, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

关键词: Childhood Obesity;    Health inequalities;    Social Determinants of Health;    Health Policy;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12889-021-12364-6

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThe UK government released Chapter 1 of the ‘Childhood Obesity: a plan for action’ (2016), followed by Chapter 2 (2018) and preliminary Chapter 3 was published for consultation in 2019 (hereon collectively ‘The Policy’). The stated policy aims were to reduce the prevalence of childhood obesity in England, addressing disparities in health by reducing the gap (approximately two-fold) in childhood obesity between those from the most and least deprived areas.MethodsCombining a realist approach with an analysis of policy discourses, we analysed the policies using a social determinants of health (SDH) perspective (focusing on socio-economic inequalities). This novel approach reveals how the framing of policy ‘problems’ leads to particular approaches and interventions.ResultsWhile recognising a social gradient in relation to obesity measures, we critique obesity problem narratives. The Policy included some upstream, structural approaches (e.g. restrictions in food advertising and the soft-drinks industry levy). However, the focus on downstream individual-level behavioural approaches to reduce calorie intake and increase physical activity does not account for the SDH and the complexity and contestedness of ‘obesity’ and pays insufficient attention to how proposals will help to reduce inequalities. Our findings illustrate that individualising of responsibility to respond to what wider evidence shows is structural inequalities, can perpetuate damaging narratives and lead to ineffective interventions, providing caution to academics, practitioners and policy makers (local and national), of the power of problem representation. Our findings also show that the problem framing in The Policy risks reducing important public health aims to encourage healthy diets and increase opportunities for physical activity (and the physical and mental health benefits of both) for children to weight management with a focus on particular children.ConclusionsWe propose an alternative conceptualisation of the policy ‘problem’, that obesity rates are illustrative of inequality, arguing there needs to be policy focus on the structural and factors that maintain health inequalities, including poverty and food insecurity. We hope that our findings can be used to challenge and strengthen future policy development, leading to more effective action against health inequalities and intervention-generated inequalities in health.

【 授权许可】

CC BY