Identifying the most effective behavioural assays and predator cues for quantifying anti-predator responses in mammals: a systematic review protocol

Environmental Evidence

Jan M. Hemmi¹  Natasha D. Harrison¹  Nicola J. Mitchell¹  Adrian F. Wayne²  Ben L. Phillips³  Rochelle Steven⁴ 

[1] School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, 6009, Crawley, WA, Australia;School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, 6009, Crawley, WA, Australia;Biodiversity and Conservation Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, 6258, Manjimup, WA, Australia;School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, 6009, Crawley, WA, Australia;School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville3010, VIC, Australia;School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, 6009, Crawley, WA, Australia;WWF-Australia, Selby St, 6018, Wembley, WA, Australia;

关键词: Anti-predator behaviour;    Behavioural adaptation;    Behavioural assay;    Effect size;    Evidence synthesis;    Predator avoidance;    Predator cue;    Prey naivete;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s13750-021-00253-9

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundMammals, globally, are facing population declines. Strategies increasingly employed to recover threatened mammal populations include protecting populations inside predator-free havens, and translocating animals from one site to another, or from a captive breeding program. These approaches can expose predator-naïve animals to predators they have never encountered and as a result, many conservation projects have failed due to the predation of individuals that lacked appropriate anti-predator responses. Hence robust ways to measure anti-predator responses are urgently needed to help identify naïve populations at risk, to select appropriate animals for translocation, and to monitor managed populations for trait change. Here, we outline a protocol for a systematic review that collates existing behavioural assays developed for the purpose of quantifying anti-predator responses, and identifies assay types and predator cues that provoke the greatest behavioural responses.MethodsWe will retrieve articles from academic bibliographic databases and grey literature sources (such as government and conservation management reports), using a Boolean search string. Each article will be screened for the satisfaction of eligibility criteria determined using the PICO (Population—Intervention—Comparator—Outcome) framework, to yield the final article pool. Using metadata extracted from each article, we will map all known behavioural assays for quantifying anti-predator responses in mammals and will then examine the context in which each assay has been implemented (e.g. species tested, predator cue characteristics). Finally, with mixed effects modelling, we will determine which of these assays and predator cue types elicit the greatest behavioural responses (standardised difference in response between treatment and control groups). The final review will highlight the most robust methodology, will reveal promising techniques on which to focus future assay development, and will collate relevant information for conservation managers.

【 授权许可】

CC BY