Patient, carer, and staff perceptions of robotics in motor rehabilitation: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Joseph Akanuwe¹  A. Niroshan Siriwardena¹  Despina Laparidou¹  Ffion Curtis²  Ayse Kucukyilmaz³  Khaled Goher⁴ 

[1] Community and Health Research Unit, School of Health and Social Care, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincolnshire, LN6 7TS, Lincoln, UK;Diabetes Research Centre, College of Medicine, Biological Sciences and Psychology, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, LE5 4PW, Leicester, UK;School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Jubilee Campus, Wollaton Road, NG8 2DU, Nottingham, UK;School of Engineering, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincolnshire, LN6 7DQ, Lincoln, UK;

关键词: Robotics;    Motor rehabilitation;    Patients;    Carers;    Staff;    Perceptions;    Experiences;    Systematic review;    Meta-synthesis;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12984-021-00976-3

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundIn recent years, robotic rehabilitation devices have often been used for motor training. However, to date, no systematic reviews of qualitative studies exploring the end-user experiences of robotic devices in motor rehabilitation have been published. The aim of this study was to review end-users’ (patients, carers and healthcare professionals) experiences with robotic devices in motor rehabilitation, by conducting a systematic review and thematic meta-synthesis of qualitative studies concerning the users’ experiences with such robotic devices.MethodsQualitative studies and mixed-methods studies with a qualitative element were eligible for inclusion. Nine electronic databases were searched from inception to August 2020, supplemented with internet searches and forward and backward citation tracking from the included studies and review articles. Data were synthesised thematically following the Thomas and Harden approach. The CASP Qualitative Checklist was used to assess the quality of the included studies of this review.ResultsThe search strategy identified a total of 13,556 citations and after removing duplicates and excluding citations based on title and abstract, and full text screening, 30 studies were included. All studies were considered of acceptable quality. We developed six analytical themes: logistic barriers; technological challenges; appeal and engagement; supportive interactions and relationships; benefits for physical, psychological, and social function(ing); and expanding and sustaining therapeutic options.ConclusionsDespite experiencing technological and logistic challenges, participants found robotic devices acceptable, useful and beneficial (physically, psychologically, and socially), as well as fun and interesting. Having supportive relationships with significant others and positive therapeutic relationships with healthcare staff were considered the foundation for successful rehabilitation and recovery.

【 授权许可】

CC BY