Evaluating willingness for surgery using the SMART Choice (Knee) patient prognostic tool for total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Chris Schilling¹  Lauren Patten¹  Peter Choong¹  Michelle Dowsey¹  Yuxuan Zhou¹  Claire Weeden¹  Samantha Bunzli¹ 

[1]Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

关键词: Total knee arthroplasty;    Osteoarthritis;    Prognostic tool;    Machine learning;    Artificial intelligence;    Predictive model;    Decision support tools;    Patient-reported outcome measures;    Willingness for surgery;    Patient satisfaction;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12891-022-05123-0

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundApproximately 1 in 5 patients feel unsatisfied after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Prognostic tools may aid in the patient selection process and reduce the proportion of patients who experience unsatisfactory surgery. This study uses the prognostic tool SMART Choice (Patient Prognostic Tool for Total Knee Arthroplasty) to predict patient improvement after TKA. The tool aims to be used by the patient without clinician input and does not require clinical data such as X-ray findings or blood results. The objective of this study is to evaluate the SMART Choice tool on patient decision making, particularly willingness for surgery. We hypothesise that the use of the SMART Choice tool will influence willingness to undergo surgery, especially when used earlier in the patient TKA journey.MethodsThis is a multicentred, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial conducted in Melbourne, Australia. Participants will be recruited from the St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne (SVHM) Orthopaedic Clinic, and the client base of HCF, Australia (private health insurance company). Patients over 45 years of age who have been diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis and considering TKA are eligible for participation. Participants will be randomised to either use the SMART Choice tool or treatment as usual. The SMART Choice tool provides users with a prediction for improvement or deterioration / no change after surgery based on utility score change calculated from the Veterans-RAND 12 (VR-12) survey. The primary outcome of the study is patient willingness for TKA surgery. The secondary outcomes include evaluating the optimal timing for tool use and using decision quality questionnaires to understand the patient experience when using the tool. Participants will be followed up for 6 months from the time of recruitment.DiscussionThe SMART Choice tool has the potential to improve patient decision making for TKA. Although many prognostic tools have been developed for other areas of surgery, most are confined within academic bodies of work. This study will be one of the first to evaluate the impact of a prognostic tool on patient decision making using a prospective clinical trial, an important step in transitioning the tool for use in clinical practice.Trial registrationAustralia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) - ACTRN12622000072718. Prospectively registered – 21 January 2022.

【 授权许可】

CC BY