期刊论文详细信息
BMC Public Health
A decade of conditional cash transfer programs for reproductive health in India: How did equality fare?
David R. Hotchkiss1  Deepali Godha2 
[1] Department of International Health and Sustainable Development, Tulane University, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, USA;Independent Research Consultant, 16/1 South Tukoganj, 201 Sukh Sheetal II, 452001, Indore, MP, India;
关键词: Maternal health care;    Inequality analysis;    Conditional cash transfer programs;    Janani Suraksha Yojana;    Inequality;    Erreygers index;    Wagstaff index;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12889-022-12563-9
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundSince 2005, India has implemented conditional cash transfer [CCT] programs to promote the uptake of institutional delivery services [ID]. The study aims to assess changes in wealth-based inequality in the use of ID and other maternal health care services during the first decade of Janani Suraksha Yojana and related CCT programs.MethodsData from two Demographic and Health Surveys were used to calculate changes in service inequality from 2005 to 2015–16 in the use of three or more antenatal care [ANC] visits, ID, and postnatal care [PNC]. The changes were assessed at the national level, within high and low performing states [HPS and LPS, respectively] and within urban and rural areas of each state category. Erreygers Index [EI] and Wagstaff Index [WI], superior to concentration index, were used to gain different insights into the nature of inequality. EI is an objective measure of inequality irrespective of prevalence while WI is a combined measure of inequality and the average distribution of an indicator that puts more weight on the poor.ResultsThe results suggest that wealth-based inequalities decreased significantly at the national level. For ID, both indices showed a decline in both HPS and LPS though the change in WI in HPS was insignificant. For ANC, there was a significant decrease in inequality using both indices in HPS but not in LPS. For PNC, there was a significant decrease in inequality using both indices in HPS, and when using WI in LPS, but not when using EI in LPS.ConclusionOverall, the first decade of India’s CCT programs saw an impressive reduction in EI for ID but less so for WI suggesting that the benefit of CCTs did not go disproportionately to the poor, which suggests that there is a need to reduce or eliminate the evident leakages. The improvement in uptake and inequality in ANC and PNC was not at par with ID, stressing the need to place greater focus on the continuum of care. The urban rural difference in HPS versus LPS in the changes in inequality reveals that infrastructure is important for CCTs to be more effective.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202202188927120ZK.pdf 1714KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:3次 浏览次数:1次