Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials assessment in congenital scoliosis

BMC Neurology

Yang Yuan¹  Huaguang Qi¹  Yi Wang²  Tao Luo²  Jingfeng Li²  Lin Cai³  Zhenxing Zhang³ 

[1] Department of Functional Examinantion, Xi’an HongHui Hospital Affiliated of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China;Department of Orthopedics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China;Department of neurospinal, Xi’an HongHui Hospital Affiliated of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China;

关键词: Congenital scoliosis;    Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials (DSEPs);    Cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs);    Sensitivity;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12883-022-02579-4

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the value of dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials (DSEPs) and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) in monitoring spinal cord function for patients with congenital scoliosis (CS).MethodsThis retrospective study reviewed the medical records of patients (n = 102) who underwent DSEP (T2-S1 dermatome), of whom 60 were normal subjects and 62 with congenital scoliosis. The study analyzed the latencies and peaks of N1-L, N1-R, P1-L and P1-R recorded by DSEPs of patients’ thoracolumbar dermatomes. To observe the incidence of abnormal DSEPs and SSEPs in CS patients and to analyze the difference in sensitivity and reliability between the two in the examination of scoliosis patients. SPSS 22.0 statistical software package was used to analyze the data, and χ2 test and correlation analysis were used to indicate that the difference was statistically significant, p < 0.05.ResultsSixty two patients with CS were evaluated with total spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Only 23 patients (37.09%) showed spinal cord malformations in the MRI findings. The DSEP recordings showed a relatively high sensitivity (97.8%) compared to the abnormality rate of SSEPs recordings, and the rates of waveform, latency and amplitude abnormalities were much higher in DSEPs recordings (36.6, 36.3, 24.8%) than in SSEPs recordings (3.2, 22.5, 14.5%). The abnormality rate of DSEP records with and without neurological symptoms was higher than the abnormality rate of SSEP records (100% vs 20, 96.2% vs 44.2%, p<0.05). And in 62 patients with CS, the rate of positive MRI (37.1%) was lower than that recorded by DSEP (79.6% / 57.9%). p < 0.05.ConclusionDSEPs are more sensitive to microscopic posterior column dysfunction in patients with CS that cannot be detected by either radiology or routine clinical examination. Preoperative DSEPs assessment is recommended as a baseline examination for intraoperative monitoring and comparison with the postoperative situation. DSEPs recording complements the information obtained from routine clinical and radiological evaluation.

【 授权许可】

CC BY