| Cardiovascular Ultrasound | |
| Comparison of left atrial deformation parameters between renal transplant and hemodialysis patients | |
| Okan Gulel1  Ufuk Yildirim1  Metin Coksevim1  Murat Akcay1  Ercan Turkmen2  | |
| [1] Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey;Department of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey; | |
| 关键词: Renal transplantation; Hemodialysis; Speckle tracking echocardiography; Left atrial function; Strain; Strain rate; | |
| DOI : 10.1186/s12947-022-00275-4 | |
| 来源: Springer | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
BackgroundRenal transplantation (RT) has been demonstrated to improve left ventricular systolic function. However, only few studies have attempted to reveal the effects of transplantation on left atrial (LA) function. In our study, we aimed to compare LA function between RT and hemodialysis patients.MethodsThis cross-sectional study included 75 consecutive patients with RT, and 75 age- and gender-matched patients on maintenance hemodialysis. LA strain and strain rate (SR) analyzed by two-dimensional (2D) speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) were compared between the groups in addition to standard echocardiographic parameters.ResultsLA strain during reservoir phase (29.88 ± 5.76% vs 26.11 ± 5.74%, P < .001), LA strain during conduit phase (− 15.28 ± 5.00% vs − 12.92 ± 4.38%, P = .003), and LA strain during contraction phase (− 14.60 ± 3.32% vs − 13.19 ± 3.95%, P = .020) were higher in the transplantation group. Similarly, LA peak SR during reservoir phase (1.54 ± 0.33 s− 1 vs 1.32 ± 0.33 s− 1, P < .001), LA peak SR during conduit phase (− 1.47 ± 0.49 s− 1 vs − 1.12 ± 0.42 s− 1, P < .001), and LA peak SR during contraction phase (− 2.13 ± 0.46 s− 1 vs − 1.83 ± 0.58 s− 1, P = .001) were higher in the transplantation group as well.ConclusionsLA function assessed by 2D STE was better in RT patients than hemodialysis patients. This may suggest favorable effects of RT on LA function.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| RO202202185777704ZK.pdf | 959KB |
PDF