Clinical utility of a pediatric hand exoskeleton: identifying users, practicability, and acceptance, and recommendations for design improvement

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Roger Gassert¹  Jan Dittli¹  Olivier Lambercy¹  Andreas Meyer-Heim²  Hubertus J. A. van Hedel²  Jan Lieber² 

[1] Rehabilitation Engineering Laboratory, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland;Swiss Children’s Rehab – Research Department, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, Mühlebergstrasse 104, CH-8910, Affoltern am Albis, Switzerland;Children’s Research Center, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Steinwiesstrasse 75, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland;

关键词: Wearable robots;    Pediatric neurorehabilitation;    Appropriateness;    Practicability;    Acceptability;    Disability;    Hand function;    Bimanual performance;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12984-022-00994-9

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundChildren and adolescents with upper limb impairments can experience limited bimanual performance reducing daily-life independence. We have developed a fully wearable pediatric hand exoskeleton (PEXO) to train or compensate for impaired hand function. In this study, we investigated its appropriateness, practicability, and acceptability.MethodsChildren and adolescents aged 6–18 years with functional limitations in at least one hand due to a neurological cause were selected for this cross-sectional evaluation. We characterized participants by various clinical tests and quantified bimanual performance with the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA). We identified children whose AHA scaled score increased by ≥ 7 points when using the hand exoskeleton and determined clinical predictors to investigate appropriateness. The time needed to don each component and the number of technical issues were recorded to evaluate practicability. For acceptability, the experiences of the patients and the therapist with PEXO were evaluated. We further noted any adverse events.ResultsEleven children (median age 11.4 years) agreed to participate, but data was available for nine participants. The median AHA scaled score was higher with PEXO (68; IQR: 59.5–83) than without (55; IQR: 37.5–80.5; p = 0.035). The Box and Block test, the Selective Control of the Upper Extremity Scale, and finger extensor muscle strength could differentiate well between those participants who improved in AHA scaled scores by ≥ 7 points and those who did not (sensitivity and specificity varied between 0.75 and 1.00). The median times needed to don the back module, the glove, and the hand module were 62, 150, and 160 s, respectively, but all participants needed assistance. The most critical failures were the robustness of the transmission system, the electronics, and the attachment system. Acceptance was generally high, particularly in participants who improved bimanual performance with PEXO. Five participants experienced some pressure points. No adverse events occurred.ConclusionsPEXO is a safe exoskeleton that can improve bimanual hand performance in young patients with minimal hand function. PEXO receives high acceptance. We formulated recommendations to improve technical issues and the donning before such exoskeletons can be used under daily-life conditions for therapy or as an assistive device.Trial registration Not appropriate

【 授权许可】

CC BY