Reconciling differences pertaining to the origin of SARS-CoV-2

Bulletin of the National Research Centre

Yasin Ali Muhammad¹ 

[1] Department of Biological Sciences, Winston-Salem State University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA;

关键词: SARS-CoV-2;    COVID-19;    Virology;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s42269-022-00712-4

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundAt the time of this writing, SARS-CoV-2 has reportedly claimed the lives of millions of people worldwide. However, there is still disagreement concerning the origin of SARS-CoV-2, its true nature, and the extent of its pathogenicity. Thus, the purpose of this manuscript is to highlight and critically analyze these differences so that research efforts can be geared toward addressing these concerns.Main BodyFor this purpose, the author studied the perspectives of both conventional and non-conventional scientists, physicians, and researchers in an attempt to understand the points of contention and the reasons for the vast gulf in perspective.ConclusionAfter reviewing the varying but divergent perspective pertaining to the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and the premises used to justify them, it has become clear that if the scientific community is to put a halt to the spread of misinformation pertaining to the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, the predominant scientific community (particularly the microbiologist/immunologist) must carry out the requisite scientific procedures and encourage governmental/academic transparency.

【 授权许可】

CC BY