Worse Theory of Mind in Only-Children Compared to Children With Siblings and Its Intervention

Frontiers in Psychology

Hui Li¹  Haoxue Yu¹  Zhuo Zhang¹  Muyun Long² 

[1] School of Education, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China;School of Education, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom;

关键词: theory of mind;    first-born children;    second-born children;    siblings;    only-children;    cognitive verb training;   

DOI  :  10.3389/fpsyg.2021.754168

来源: Frontiers

【 摘 要 】

The purpose of this study was to explore theory of mind (ToM) differences in children with different birth orders (only-children, first-born children, and second-born children), and further explore the effect of cognitive verb training for only-children’s ToM. Adopting the paradigm of false belief, Study 1 was conducted in which a sample of 120 children aged 3–6, including first-born children, second-born children (siblings aged 1–13 years), and only-children were tested. The results showed that (1) children aged 3–6 had significantly higher scores on first-order false-belief than second-order false-belief. (2) Controlling for age, the only-children scored significantly lower than the first-born children. In Study 2, 28 only-children aged 4–5 (13 in the experimental group and 15 in the control group) who initially failed in false-belief tasks were trained with the cognitive verb animations. Significant post-training improvements were observed for only-children who received training of animations embedded with cognitive verb. Those findings indicated that ToM of only-children was significantly worse than first-born children of two-child families, and linguistic training could facilitate ToM of only-children whose ToM were at a disadvantage.

【 授权许可】

CC BY