Organisational determinants and consequences of diagnostic discrepancy in two large patient groups in the emergency departments: a national study of consecutive episodes between 2008 and 2016

BMC Emergency Medicine

Line Stjernholm Tipsmark¹  Børge Obel²  Rikke Søgaard³  Tommy Andersson⁴ 

[1] DEFACTUM, Central Denmark Region, Olof Palmes Allé 15, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark;Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark;DESIGN EM – Research Network for Organizational Design and Emergency Medicine, Fuglesangs Allé 4, 8210, Aarhus V, Denmark;DESIGN EM – Research Network for Organizational Design and Emergency Medicine, Fuglesangs Allé 4, 8210, Aarhus V, Denmark;Department of Management, Aarhus University, Fuglesangs Allé 4, 8210, Aarhus V, Denmark;Interdisciplinary Centre for Organizational Architecture, Aarhus University, Fuglesangs Allé 4, 8210, Aarhus V, Denmark;Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark;Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000, Odense C, Denmark;Regional Hospital West Jutland, Gl. Landevej 61, 7400, Herning, Denmark;

关键词: Emergency service, hospital;    Denmark;    Diagnostic error;    Organization and administration;    Emergency medicine;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12873-021-00538-9

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundDiagnostic discrepancy (DD) is a common phenomenon in healthcare, but little is known about its organisational determinants and consequences. Thus, the aim of the study was to evaluate this among selected emergency department (ED) patients.MethodWe conducted an observational study including all consecutive ED patients (hip fracture or erysipelas) in the Danish healthcare sector admitted between 2008 and 2016. DD was defined as a discrepancy between discharge and admission diagnoses. Episode and department statistics were retrieved from Danish registers. We conducted a survey among all 21 Danish EDs to gather information about organisational determinants. To estimate the results while adjusting for episode- and department-level heterogeneity, we used mixed effect models of ED organisational determinants and 30-day readmission, 30-day mortality and episode costs (2018-DKK) of DDs.ResultsDD was observed in 2308 (3.3%) of 69,928 hip fracture episodes and 3206 (8.5%) of 37,558 erysipelas episodes. The main organisational determinant of DD was senior physicians (nonspecific medical specialty) being employed at the ED (hip fracture: odds ratio (OR) 2.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.15–3.51; erysipelas: OR 3.29, 95% CI 2.65–4.07). However, 24-h presence of senior physicians (nonspecific medical specialty) (hip fracture) and availability of external senior physicians (specific medical specialty) (both groups) were negatively associated with DD. DD was associated with increased 30-day readmission (hip fracture, mean 9.45% vs 13.76%, OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.28–1.66, p < 0.001) and episode costs (hip fracture, 61,681 DKK vs 109,860 DKK, log cost 0.58, 95% CI 0.53–0.63, p < 0.001; erysipelas, mean 20,818 DKK vs 56,329 DKK, log cost 0.97, 95% CI 0.92–1.02, p < 0.001) compared with episodes without DD.ConclusionDD was found to have a negative impact on two out of three study outcomes, and particular organisational characteristics seem to be associated with DD. Yet, the complexity of organisations and settings warrant further studies into these associations.

【 授权许可】

CC BY