期刊论文详细信息
Systematic Reviews
Enrollment, retention, and strategies for including disadvantaged populations in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review protocol
Joanna Crocker1  Carla Richters2  Danielle Schubbe3  Alice M. Kennedy3  Renata W. Yen3  Nancy O’Brien3  Jaclyn Engel3  Abigail LaPlante4  Marie-Anne Durand5  Talia Isaacs6  Zsofia Demjen6 
[1] Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Woodstock Rd, OX2 6GG, Oxford, UK;Patient and Family Advocate, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center Office of Patient Experience, 1 Medical Center Drive, 03756, Lebanon, NH, USA;The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Williamson Translational Research Building, Level 5, 1 Medical Center Drive, 03756, Lebanon, NH, USA;The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Williamson Translational Research Building, Level 5, 1 Medical Center Drive, 03756, Lebanon, NH, USA;Tufts University School of Medicine, 145 Harrison Ave, 02111, Boston, MA, USA;The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Williamson Translational Research Building, Level 5, 1 Medical Center Drive, 03756, Lebanon, NH, USA;UMR 1027, équipe EQUITY, Faculté de Médecine, 37 Allées Jules Guesde, 31000, Toulouse, France;UCL Centre for Applied Linguistics, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, 20 Bedford Way, WC1H 0AL, London, UK;
关键词: Disadvantaged populations;    Trial recruitment;    Randomized controlled trials;    Enrollment;    Retention;    Health interventions;    Health;    Disparities;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s13643-021-01790-7
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundMany randomized controlled trials fail to reach their target sample size. When coupled with the omission and underrepresentation of disadvantaged groups in randomized controlled trials, many trials fail to obtain data that accurately represents the true diversity of their target population. Policies and practices have been implemented to increase representation of disadvantaged groups in many randomized controlled trials, with some trials specifically targeting such groups. To our knowledge, no systematic review has quantified the enrollment metrics and effectiveness of inclusion and retention strategies in randomized controlled trials focused on disadvantaged populations specifically.MethodsWe will conduct a systematic search across EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and CINAHL as well as grey literature, conference proceedings, research monographs, and Google Scholar from inception onwards. We will include randomized controlled trials where at least 50% of enrolled participants are considered to be disadvantaged, as per the RCT authors’ definition and in line with our inclusion criteria. Two independent researchers per article will conduct preliminary title and abstract screening, subsequent full text review, and data extraction for the selected trials, with a third reviewer available to resolve conflicts. We will assess the quality of all included studies using specific criteria regarding data reporting, external validity, and internal validity. We will combine all selected studies and conduct a narrative synthesis to assess enrollment metrics. If there is sufficient homogeneity and sufficient trials comparing recruitment strategies within disadvantaged populations, we will conduct a random effects meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of strategies designed to maximize the inclusion of disadvantaged populations in randomized controlled trials.DiscussionThe findings of this systematic review will establish baseline recruitment and enrollment metrics of trials targeting disadvantaged populations to elucidate the scope of the challenge of recruiting such populations. We hope that our findings will promote future research on the distinct barriers that may prevent disadvantaged populations from participating in health intervention research, will encourage more trials exploring effective, tailored recruitment strategies, and will establish a foundation to track future progress in the recruitment of disadvantaged populations.Trial registrationsPROSPERO ID: CRD42020152814

【 授权许可】

CC BY   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202109173641542ZK.pdf 543KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:6次 浏览次数:2次