Optimized DNA-based identification of Toxocara spp. eggs in soil and sand samples

Parasites & Vectors

Jean-Francois Durant¹  Jean-Luc Gala¹  Leonid Mwana Wa Bene Irenge²  Wojciech Jarosz³  Renata Fogt-Wyrwas³  Hanna Mizgajska-Wiktor³ 

[1] Center for Applied Molecular Technologies, Institute of Clinical and Experimental Research, Université Catholique de Louvain, Tour Claude Bernard, Avenue Hippocrate 54-55, 1st Floor, B1.54.01, 1200, Brussels, Belgium;Center for Applied Molecular Technologies, Institute of Clinical and Experimental Research, Université Catholique de Louvain, Tour Claude Bernard, Avenue Hippocrate 54-55, 1st Floor, B1.54.01, 1200, Brussels, Belgium;Defense Laboratories Department, ACOS Ops & Trg, Belgian Armed Forces, Martelarenstraat, 181, 1800, Peutie, Belgium;Department of Biology and Anatomy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Poznań University of Physical Education, Królowej Jadwigi 27/39, 61-871, Poznan, Poland;

关键词: Toxocara canis;    Toxocara cati;    Helminth eggs;    Limit of detection;    Soil;    Sand;    Inhibitors;    DNA extraction;    qPCR;    Clean-up;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s13071-021-04904-1

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundToxocara canis and Toxocara cati are globally distributed roundworms and causative agents of human toxocariasis, via ingestion of Toxocara eggs. Control of Toxocara infections is constrained by a lack of sensitive methods for screening of animal faeces and environmental samples potentially contaminated by Toxocara eggs. In this work, a pre-analytical method for efficient extraction of DNA from Toxocara eggs in environmental samples was set up using our previously validated T. canis- and T. cati-specific quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). For this purpose, the influence of different methods for egg lysis, DNA extraction and purification for removal of PCR inhibitors were assessed on environmental samples.MethodsTo select the best egg disruption method, six protocols were compared on pure T. canis egg suspensions, including enzymatic lysis and thermal or mechanical disruption. Based on the selected best method, an analytical workflow was set up to compare two DNA extraction methods (FastDNA™ SPIN Kit for Soil versus DNeasy® PowerMax® Soil Kit) with an optional dilution and/or clean-up (Agencourt® AMPure®) step. This workflow was evaluated on 10-g soil and 10-g sand samples spiked with egg suspensions of T. canis (tenfold dilutions of 104 eggs in triplicate). The capacity of the different methods, used alone or in combination, to increase the ratio of positive tests was assessed. The resulting optimal workflow for processing spiked soil samples was then tested on environmental soil samples and compared with the conventional flotation-centrifugation and microscopic examination of Toxocara eggs.ResultsThe most effective DNA extraction method for Toxocara eggs in soil samples consisted in the combination of mechanical lysis of eggs using beads, followed by DNA extraction with the DNeasy® PowerMax® Soil Kit, and completed with an additional DNA clean-up step with AMPure® beads and a sample DNA dilution (1:10). This workflow exhibited a limit of detection of 4 and 46 T.canis eggs in 10-g sand and 10-g soil samples, respectively.ConclusionsThe pre-analytical flow process developed here combined with qPCR represents an improved, potentially automatable, and cost-effective method for the surveillance of Toxocara contamination in the environment.Graphical Abstract

【 授权许可】

CC BY