The recent 10-year landscape of aortic dissection research: a bibliometric analysis

Journal of Thoracic Disease

article

Jinlin Wu¹  Rui Zhao²  Donglin Zhuang¹  Jiade Zhu¹  Haiyun Zheng¹  Jimei Chen¹ 

[1]Department of Cardiac Surgery, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences

[2]Department of Vascular Surgery, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College

[3]Shantou University Medical College

关键词: Aortic dissection;    bibliometric;    PubMed;   

DOI  :  10.21037/jtd-20-3272

学科分类：呼吸医学

来源: Pioneer Bioscience Publishing Company

【 摘 要 】

Background: We aimed to comprehensively analyze all the literature related to aortic dissection (AD) in the past decade using Web Scrapping technology from PubMed, revealing the research dynamics in this field. Methods: Data were retrieved and downloaded from PubMed with search strategy as “(aortic dissection [Title/Abstract]) AND (2010[EDAT]: 2020[EDAT])”. Information on the PMID, journal name, title, number of citations, publication year, authors, affiliations, abstract, study type, and keywords of the research was recorded. Results: A total of 7,470 publications were identified. Most of the articles were published in J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; Japan was the country with the largest publications number; the USA was far ahead of other countries regarding the highly cited studies; Yale University and Baylor College of Medicine took the first place for publishing most of the highly cited articles; the most frequently cited article is the 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases; most of the clinical trials were published on J Vasc Surg ; John A. Elefteriades ranked first by cumulative publication numbers; Christoph A. Nienaber took the lead by both cumulative citations and impact factors; Dianna M. Milewicz was the only female researcher on all the three ranking lists; the most common keywords in aortic dissection were Treatment Outcome and Retrospective Studies. Conclusions: This study provides interesting insights into the AD scientific landscape in recent 10 years and generates some objective evidence for comprehensive understanding and evaluation of this field. This investigation may ultimately inform managers, researchers and policymakers.

【 授权许可】

Unknown