Frontiers in Psychology | |
Moral Rationalization Contributes More Strongly to Escalation of Unethical Behavior Among Low Moral Identifiers Than Among High Moral Identifiers | |
article | |
Laetitia B. Mulder1  Eric van Dijk2  | |
[1] Department of Human Resource Management and Organizational Behaviour, University of Groningen;Department of Social, Leiden University | |
关键词: moral rationalization; moral disengagement; moral identity; escalation; behavioral ethics; | |
DOI : 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02912 | |
学科分类:社会科学、人文和艺术(综合) | |
来源: Frontiers | |
【 摘 要 】
Occasional acts of immorality are commonplace. One way in which people deal with their own prior immoral acts, is to rationalize why their acts are morally acceptable. It has been argued that such post hoc moral rationalizations may contribute to continuation or escalation of immoral behavior. This paper experimentally tests this causal influence of post hoc moral argumentation on escalation of immoral behavior and also tests how this depends on people’s level of moral identity. In three experiments we asked participants to generate moral arguments for their past behaviors. The results show that engaging in moral rationalization causes subsequent continuation and escalation of previous immoral behavior, but more so for low moral identifiers than for high moral identifiers.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO202108170012104ZK.pdf | 680KB | download |