An Extensive Knowledge Mapping Review of Measurement and Validity in Language Assessment and SLA Research

Frontiers in Psychology

article

Vahid Aryadoust¹  Azrifah Zakaria¹  Mei Hui Lim¹  Chaomei Chen² 

[1] National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University;College of Computing and Informatics, Drexel University, United States;Department of Information Science, Yonsei University

关键词: document co-citation analysis;    language assessment;    measurement;    review;    Scientometrics;    validity;    visualization;    Second language acquisition;   

DOI  :  10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01941

学科分类：社会科学、人文和艺术（综合）

来源: Frontiers

【 摘 要 】

This study set out to investigate intellectual domains as well as the use of measurement and validation methods in language assessment research and second language acquisition (SLA) published in English in peer-reviewed journals. Using Scopus, we created two datasets: (i) a dataset of core journals consisting of 1,561 articles published in four language assessment journals, and (ii) a dataset of general journals consisting of 3,175 articles on language assessment published in the top journals of SLA and applied linguistics. We applied document co-citation analysis to detect thematically distinct research clusters. Next, we coded citing papers in each cluster based on an analytical framework for measurement and validation. We found that the focus of the core journals was more exclusively on reading and listening comprehension assessment (primary), facets of speaking and writing performance such as raters and validation (secondary), as well as feedback, corpus linguistics, and washback (tertiary). By contrast, the primary focus of assessment research in the general journals was on vocabulary, oral proficiency, essay writing, grammar, and reading. The secondary focus was on affective schemata, awareness, memory, language proficiency, explicit vs. implicit language knowledge, language or semantic awareness, and semantic complexity. With the exception of language proficiency, this second area of focus was absent in the core journals. It was further found that the majority of citing publications in the two datasets did not carry out inference-based validation on their instruments before using them. More research is needed to determine what motivates authors to select and investigate a topic, how thoroughly they cite past research, and what internal (within a field) and external (between fields) factors lead to the sustainability of a Research Topic in language assessment.

【 授权许可】

CC BY