期刊论文详细信息
Frontiers in Public Health
Heated Tobacco Products: A Review of Current Knowledge and Initial Assessments
article
Nadja Mallock1  Christoph Hutzler1  Frank Henkler-Stephani1  Andreas Luch1 
[1]Department of Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR)
关键词: heated tobacco products;    emissions;    harm reduction;    risk assessment;    tobacco smoke;   
DOI  :  10.3389/fpubh.2019.00287
学科分类:社会科学、人文和艺术(综合)
来源: Frontiers
PDF
【 摘 要 】
The health risks of tobacco smoking have been documented in numerous studies and smoking rates have declined in developed countries over the last 50 years. Today, we know that cigarette smoking is the major cause of preventable deaths due to tobacco smoke induced diseases. As a consequence of an increased awareness of smoking-related health risks, heated tobacco products (HTPs) are marketed as reduced toxicant alternatives to conventional tobacco products. Manufacturers claim that levels of toxicants and hazardous compounds are significantly reduced, implying that inhalation of the modified aerosol is less harmful compared to conventional cigarettes. In this manuscript, previous assessments of HTPs are briefly summarized, including a short discussion on challenges with the adaption of standard analytical methods used for tobacco smoke. The reliability of analytical data is important for risk assessment approaches that are based on reduced toxicant exposure. In order to assess a putative reduction of health risks, an integrated study design is required that should include clinical studies and epidemiology data. One manufacturer applied for a classification as a Modified Risk Tobacco Product (MRTP) in the United States, based on extensive toxicological studies that have also been published. However, data are not yet sufficient for a reliable assessment or recognition of putatively reduced health risks. Challenges regarding a classification in Europe are also discussed briefly in this review.
【 授权许可】

CC BY   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202108170001147ZK.pdf 601KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次