期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications
Tolerance intervals in statistical software and robustness under model misspecification
Hon Keung Tony Ng1  Kyung Serk Cho2 
[1] Department of Statistical Science, Southern Methodist University, 75275-0332, Dallas, TX, USA;Department of Statistics, Columbia University, 10027, New York, NY, USA;
关键词: Cauchy distribution;    Maximum likelihood;    Model selection;    Model uncertainty;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s40488-021-00123-2
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

A tolerance interval is a statistical interval that covers at least 100ρ% of the population of interest with a 100(1−α)% confidence, where ρ and α are pre-specified values in (0, 1). In many scientific fields, such as pharmaceutical sciences, manufacturing processes, clinical sciences, and environmental sciences, tolerance intervals are used for statistical inference and quality control. Despite the usefulness of tolerance intervals, the procedures to compute tolerance intervals are not commonly implemented in statistical software packages. This paper aims to provide a comparative study of the computational procedures for tolerance intervals in some commonly used statistical software packages including JMP, Minitab, NCSS, Python, R, and SAS. On the other hand, we also investigate the effect of misspecifying the underlying probability model on the performance of tolerance intervals. We study the performance of tolerance intervals when the assumed distribution is the same as the true underlying distribution and when the assumed distribution is different from the true distribution via a Monte Carlo simulation study. We also propose a robust model selection approach to obtain tolerance intervals that are relatively insensitive to the model misspecification. We show that the proposed robust model selection approach performs well when the underlying distribution is unknown but candidate distributions are available.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202108125679515ZK.pdf 715KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:8次 浏览次数:6次