Survival rates and reasons for revision of different stem designs in total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia: a regional registry study

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Giuseppe Geraci¹  Federico Pilla¹  Niccolò Stefanini¹  Cesare Faldini²  Alberto Di Martino²  Francesco Traina³  Barbara Bordini⁴  Francesco Castagnini⁵ 

[1] Clinica Ortopedica E Traumatologica I, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Pupilli, 1, 40136, Bologna, Italy;Clinica Ortopedica E Traumatologica I, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Pupilli, 1, 40136, Bologna, Italy;Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Neuromotorie - DIBINEM, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy;Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Neuromotorie - DIBINEM, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy;Ortopedia-Traumatologia E Chirurgia Protesica E Dei Reimpianti Di Anca E Ginocchio, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Pupilli, 1, 40136, Bologna, Italy;Laboratorio Di Tecnologia Medica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano, 1/10, 40136, Bologna, Italy;Ortopedia-Traumatologia E Chirurgia Protesica E Dei Reimpianti Di Anca E Ginocchio, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Pupilli, 1, 40136, Bologna, Italy;

关键词: Tapered;    Anatomic;    Modular;    Conical;    Dislocation;    Loosening;    DDH;    Dysplasia;    Stem;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s10195-021-00590-y

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

IntroductionTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) in dysplastic hips is challenging, and each specific implant used in this context has been associated with specific complications. A registry study was performed to query survival rates, hazard ratios, and reasons for revision of different stem designs in THAs after developmental dysplasia of the hip.Materials and methodsA regional arthroplasty registry was inquired about cementless THAs performed for hip dysplasia from 2000 to 2017. Patients were stratified according to stem design in tapered (TAP; wedge and rectangular), anatomic (ANAT), and conical (CON), and divided on the basis of modularity (modular, M; nonmodular, NM). In total, 2039 TAP stems (548 M and 1491 NM), 1435 ANAT (1072 M and 363 NM), and 2287 CON (1020 M and 1267 NM) implants were included. Survival rates and reasons for revisions were compared.ResultsThe groups were homogeneous for demographics, but not fully comparable in terms of implant features. NM-CON stems showed the highest risk of failure (significant) and a high risk for cup aseptic loosening (2.5%). The adjusted risk ratio showed that NM-CON was more prone to failure (HR versus NM-ANAT: 3.30; 95%CI 1.64–7.87; p = 0.0003). Revision rates for dislocations and stem aseptic loosening did not differ between cohorts.ConclusionsNM-CON stems showed the highest risk of failure, especially high rates of cup aseptic loosening. NM-CON implants were not more prone to dislocations and stem aseptic loosening. Clinical comparative studies are required to investigate the causes of NM-CON failures, which may be due to abnormal acetabular morphology or imperfect restoration of the proximal biomechanics.

【 授权许可】

CC BY