Patients’ and professionals’ perspectives on implementation of opportunistic salpingectomy: a mixed-method study

BMC Health Services Research

Rosella P. M. G. Hermens¹  Malou E. Gelderblom²  Joanne A. De Hullu²  Laura A. M. Van Lieshout³  Jurgen M. J. Piek⁴ 

[1] Department of IQ Health Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands;Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500, Nijmegen, HB, The Netherlands;Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500, Nijmegen, HB, The Netherlands;Department of Obstetrics and gynecology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands;Department of Obstetrics and gynecology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands;

关键词: Salpingectomy;    Primary prevention;    Ovarian neoplasms;    Risk reduction;    Implementation science;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12913-021-06767-9

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundTo prevent ovarian cancer, several international societies have issued guidelines which recommend to discuss opportunistic salpingectomy with women undergoing pelvic surgery after completion of childbearing. The opportunistic salpingectomy refers to the additional removal of Fallopian tubes during pelvic surgery for another indication to reduce the risk of developing ovarian cancer. These recommendations emphasize the importance of counselling on benefits and risks of opportunistic salpingectomy but offer no guidance on their implementation in daily practice. The lack of a tailored implementation strategy has resulted in a wide variation in current practice. To reduce this practice variation, we identified influencing factors on implementing opportunistic salpingectomy from patients’ and professionals’ perspectives.MethodsWe conducted a mixed-method study between 2019 and 2020 throughout the Netherlands. In a qualitative phase, we conducted interviews with gynecologic patients (N = 11) and their professionals (N = 20) to explore barriers and facilitators, using an interview guide. In the quantitative phase, we quantified these barriers and facilitators among patients who underwent a hysterectomy or sterilization and were counselled on the opportunistic salpingectomy (N = 77), and members of the Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (N = 204), using questionnaires. For both phases, barriers and facilitators were classified into the following domains: innovation, patient, healthcare professional, social setting, organization, and economic and political context.ResultsFor patients, main barriers were lack of knowledge about: the existence of the opportunistic salpingectomy (45%), size of the surgery (44%) and its associated possible disadvantages (37%). In addition, patients attributed their reluctance to concerns about the removal of healthy organs (46%). For professionals, main barriers were: patients’ lack of knowledge of the size of surgery (85%) and its associated possible disadvantages (77%), the gap in evidence on long term risks and benefits (43%), the lack of feasibility in certain patients and during vaginal surgery (66%). Both patients (41%) and professionals (67%) identified the need for counselling material as facilitator.ConclusionTo reduce the variety in care regarding opportunistic salpingectomy, consensus and uniform counselling is needed. Including the opportunistic salpingectomy in gynecological guidelines and a decision aid for counselling could serve as tools to facilitate implementation.

【 授权许可】

CC BY