期刊论文详细信息
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Study on the semi-supervised learning-based patient similarity from heterogeneous electronic medical records
Xiaolu Fei1  Lan Wei1  Zhiqiang Zhang2  Hui Chen2  Honglei Liu2  Yanqun Huang2  Ni Wang2 
[1] Information Center, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100053, Beijing, People’s Republic of China;School of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, No.10, Xitoutiao, You An Men, Fengtai District, 100069, Beijing, People’s Republic of China;Beijing Key Laboratory of Fundamental Research on Biomechanics in Clinical Application, Capital Medical University, 100069, Beijing, People’s Republic of China;
关键词: Patient similarity;    Electronic medical records;    Semi-supervised learning;    k;    Liver diseases;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12911-021-01432-x
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundA new learning-based patient similarity measurement was proposed to measure patients’ similarity for heterogeneous electronic medical records (EMRs) data.MethodsWe first calculated feature-level similarities according to the features’ attributes. A domain expert provided patient similarity scores of 30 randomly selected patients. These similarity scores and feature-level similarities for 30 patients comprised the labeled sample set, which was used for the semi-supervised learning algorithm to learn the patient-level similarities for all patients. Then we used the k-nearest neighbor (kNN) classifier to predict four liver conditions. The predictive performances were compared in four different situations. We also compared the performances between personalized kNN models and other machine learning models. We assessed the predictive performances by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), F1-score, and cross-entropy (CE) loss.ResultsAs the size of the random training samples increased, the kNN models using the learned patient similarity to select near neighbors consistently outperformed those using the Euclidean distance to select near neighbors (all P values < 0.001). The kNN models using the learned patient similarity to identify the top k nearest neighbors from the random training samples also had a higher best-performance (AUC: 0.95 vs. 0.89, F1-score: 0.84 vs. 0.67, and CE loss: 1.22 vs. 1.82) than those using the Euclidean distance. As the size of the similar training samples increased, which composed the most similar samples determined by the learned patient similarity, the performance of kNN models using the simple Euclidean distance to select the near neighbors degraded gradually. When exchanging the role of the Euclidean distance, and the learned patient similarity in selecting the near neighbors and similar training samples, the performance of the kNN models gradually increased. These two kinds of kNN models had the same best-performance of AUC 0.95, F1-score 0.84, and CE loss 1.22. Among the four reference models, the highest AUC and F1-score were 0.94 and 0.80, separately, which were both lower than those for the simple and similarity-based kNN models.ConclusionsThis learning-based method opened an opportunity for similarity measurement based on heterogeneous EMR data and supported the secondary use of EMR data.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202108122816550ZK.pdf 3898KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:13次 浏览次数:17次