Eye-tracking support for architects, conservators, and museologists. Anastylosis as pretext for research and discussion

Heritage Science

Marta Rusnak¹ 

[1] Department of History of Architecture, Art and Technique, Faculty of Architecture, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Bolesława Prusa 53/55, 53-317, Wrocław, Poland;

关键词: Conservation;    Visual attention;    Eye tracking;    Heritage perception;    Anastylosis;    Participatory methods;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s40494-021-00548-7

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

Conservators, museologists, and architects make extremely complex decisions capable of affecting the way people perceive monuments. One might give this idea deeper consideration while pondering anastylosis. One of the things a designer should do when selecting a method of merging together parts of a damaged monument is answer the question whether the chosen method will facilitate the interest of onlookers in the presented object. In which case will the observers spend most of their time looking at the authentic relic fragments and distinguishing between the old and the new parts? The definitions in force do not explain how to approach this topic. By using eye-tracking research, we can learn how observers look at historical objects that have been reassembled again. By combining the observation of visual behaviours with a survey of people looking at such objects, it is possible to see how the process of classifying what is new and old actually works. This knowledge allows for more conscious approach to heritage management processes. In future, results of eye-tracking experiments should help experts plan sustainable conservation projects. Thanks to knowing the reactions of regular people, one will be able to establish conservation programmes in which the material preservation of a monument will reflect the way in which this object affects contemporary onlookers. Such an approach ought to result in real social and economic benefits.

【 授权许可】

CC BY